Recruitment
Screening resumes and scheduling interviews consumes a recruiter’s entire week.
Ranges reflect typical outcomes across past engagements — we validate real numbers for your business on the strategy call.
Where recruitment teams lose the most time.
Screening resumes and scheduling interviews consumes a recruiter’s entire week.
Resumes screened manually against role criteria, one by one
Interview scheduling eats hours of back-and-forth email
Candidates left without status updates for weeks
What we build for recruitment teams.
- AI resume screening against role criteria
- Automated interview scheduling
- Candidate status updates
The work that quietly eats the week.
These are the patterns we see most often in this sector. If two or more sound familiar, there's usually a straightforward case for automating them.
Screening volume
Every application is opened and read to find the few worth a conversation.
Interview scheduling
Matching candidate and panel availability takes several emails per interview.
Candidate silence
Applicants wait weeks without an update, and good ones take other offers.
Reporting to clients or hiring managers
Pipeline updates are assembled manually for each role.
Three workflows that usually pay for themselves fastest.
Not a full rebuild — the specific pieces that remove the most manual work for the least disruption.
Application screening
A candidate applies
Details are extracted, checked against role criteria, scored with a stated reason, and shortlisted or routed for review — the hiring decision stays human
A qualified shortlist instead of an inbox
Interview scheduling
A candidate is shortlisted
Availability is collected, slots proposed, invites sent, reminders scheduled and reschedules handled
Hours of back-and-forth removed per hire
Candidate status updates
A candidate's stage changes
Appropriate updates send automatically at each stage
Fewer candidates lost to silence
See a real workflow in this space.
See client reviews, or explore the other industries we've shipped in.